Aegis Station

Rotational Dynamics

Aegis Station is three rings, each 2.23 million tonnes, turning at 1.50 rpm on a hub 650 m long that does not turn. This page is the station read as bodies that turn, through its three phases: the fill, with every ring at rest; the spin-up, all three together; and normal operation. It says what keeps a ring balanced, what is crossed on the way up to speed, what holds a ring's axis where it should be, and what would have to go wrong for a ring to reach its neighbour or for the hub to break.

Behind it is a dynamics model, a simulator that steps the model live, an operator console, and recorded runs. The figures are drawn from the model's results and the clips are those recordings. No part of this is built. Every limit on the page is a placeholder and is called one.

A side view to scale: a 650 metre hub that does not turn, three rings 200 metres apart each 350 metres from the axis to the centre of a 100 metre tube, a dock at each end of the hub, and a neck with a main bearing where the hub passes through each ring.
The station from the side, to scale. The hub is the light body: it is not yet sized, and is taken as 100,000 t against 2.23 million for each ring. Where the hub passes through a ring it narrows to a core inside the ring's collar, and the ring rides on a main bearing there.
On this page

1. The station as bodies that turn

A ring is a wheel and a gyroscope at once. As a wheel it has a rate and a balance. As a gyroscope it has an axis that it keeps unless something pushes on it, and it answers a push at right angles. Three of them sit on one hub, and the hub is light enough that the rings carry it about, not the other way round.

QuantityValue
Ring mass2.23 Mt: 2.01 Mt of shield water, 0.22 Mt of structure
Spin rate1.50 rpm, one turn in 40 s, 1 g at the 397 m floor, 63 m/s at the rim
Angular momentum4.5 × 1013 N m s per ring
Propellant to spin one ring upabout 25,000 t, 1.1 % of the ring
Segments40 per ring, each about 50,000 t of water; 1 % of each free to move for trim
Pods8 per ring at the rim, as 4 pairs, 27 kN each along the axis
Hub650 m, with a dock at each end; its mass is not yet sized and is taken as 100,000 t

The model has the hub as a bending beam with five stations, each ring free to tilt at its bearing, the share of a ring's water that does not follow it as a separate body, pods that are on or off, trim pumps with a rate and a range, and an actuator at each bearing. It is linear, good to a few degrees, which is further than anything here is allowed to go.

2. Two things that must never happen

The rings must not reach each other, and they must not break the hub. Both come down to how stiffly a ring is held in tilt at its main bearing.

  • Rings touching. Two rings 200 m apart with 100 m tubes meet when one leans 16.6° against the other. Long before that, a ring leaning 2.9° against the hub closes the 0.6 m gap at the hub/ring crossing. That gap is the limit that counts.
  • The hub breaking. It would go at a neck, where the hub narrows to pass through a ring's collar. The hub's loads are taken there.

Hold a ring stiffly and it cannot lean far, but what lean it takes goes into the hub's neck as bending. At 3 × 1010 N m per radian, the first stiffness the model was given, a ring leaning as far as the crossing gap has the neck at 97 % of its placeholder limit. Hold a ring softly and it keeps its own plane while the hub moves under it, but a fault can lean it a long way before the bearing catches it.

Two lines against bearing tilt stiffness on logarithmic axes. Softer bearings let a fault lean a ring further, past the crossing gap below about 10 to the 9 newton metres per radian. Stiffer bearings pass more moment into the hub's neck, reaching its limit near 3 times 10 to the 10. Between about 10 to the 9 and 10 to the 10 neither limit is reached.
The window. Too soft, and a pod pair stuck on for an hour during the fill, with nothing answering it, takes a ring through the crossing gap and halfway to its neighbour. Too stiff, and a ring leaning as far as the gap has already put the neck at its limit. Between about 109 and 1010 N m per radian neither happens in anything run so far. The first stiffness the model was given, 3 × 1010, sits at the stiff edge.

The working design is a bearing soft in tilt, about 3 × 109 N m per radian, with an actuator at each bearing for damping, and a hub soft enough that its bending resonance is crossed early in a spin-up. On it, in the faults run so far (a pod pair stuck on during the fill or in normal operation, a bearing actuator stuck on, a top-off landing in one segment, all control lost), the furthest a ring leans against the hub is 21 % of the crossing gap, the most a neck carries is 17 % of its limit, and the most a bearing carries is 62 % of its own. The case that comes nearest a limit is not a fault but an omission: a spin-up with the balance held, in section 5.

The bearing's limit (5 × 107 N m in tilt) and the neck's (1.5 × 109 N m in bending) are placeholders with no design behind them. What the model gives is how the loads move with the choices, not whether a particular bearing survives.

3. Three phases

The rings move together. All three are filled at rest, all three are spun up together, and they turn together from then on. A spin-down is the spin-up run backwards, again all three. At no time does one ring stand still beside another that turns: that is the least steady arrangement the model has, and this rule is what keeps the station out of it.

Three things act on the station's motion. Trim pumps move a little of the shield's water between segments, to put a ring's mass centre back on its axis. Pods at the rim fire along the axis, to turn or hold a ring's plane. An actuator at each main bearing damps a ring's tilt against the hub.

PhaseThe ringsWhat steadies the stationWhat the phase asks for
The fillAt rest, each taking on 2.01 Mt of waterPods hold each ring as an ordinary bodyAn even fill, because a ring at rest tells nothing about its balance
The spin-upFrom rest to 1.50 rpm together, over about thirty daysTrim pumps, once the readings tell them something; bearing actuatorsTwo resonances crossed without building up
Normal operationAt 1.50 rpmTrim pumps for balance, pods for the axis, bearing actuators for dampingA good reading of tilt rate

4. The fill

Each ring takes on its water at rest. Tankers dock at the two ends of the hub, full cartridges are carried along it to a ring and empties come back. At the fleet's cadence a tanker arrives or leaves every 18 minutes.

The hub hardly notices the traffic. A 53 t tanker meeting a dock with 0.05 m/s left sideways moves the dock a tenth of a millimetre and puts 0.02 % of its limit on a neck; it would have to arrive sideways at about 280 m/s to reach that limit. Docking is not a load in any phase.

What cannot be read

A ring's balance is read from what it does to the hub as it turns. A ring at rest pushes on nothing and tells nothing. In three hours of the fill on the simulator, with 2 % of one ring's delivery landing unevenly, 8 t builds off-centre and nothing shows it.

That puts a requirement on the fill. The rings are spun up through their first resonance as the fill left them. Without help from the bearing actuators the off-centre part of a ring's fill has to be under about 900 t, 0.05 % of its water. With them, about 2,300 t. Metering the fill by flow and by level in each segment is a requirement, and it is a tighter one than the pumps or the trim range.

A fault during the fill

A ring at rest is not a gyroscope. A push leans it the way it is pushed, with only the bearing's stiffness against it, so the fill is when a stuck pod matters most. One pod pair stuck on for an hour with nothing answering it leans its ring 0.59° against the hub on the working design, 21 % of the crossing gap, and puts 62 % of its placeholder limit on the bearing. This is the fault that sets the soft edge of the window in section 2.

The same fault with the ring's other pairs answering, recorded from the simulator: two and a half hours in two minutes, motion drawn a hundred times life size. Every ring is at rest and 60 % full, and tankers dock before and after. Ring 2 leans 0.08°, under 3 % of the crossing gap, and its other pairs burn as much again as the stuck pair in holding it, 89 t between them. Left: the hub's line and the three ring planes, from the side and from above. Right: each ring seen along the axis. The squares under the picture fill as each limit is approached.

5. The spin-up

All three rings come up together, from rest to 1.50 rpm over about thirty days. An imbalance pushes once a turn, so on the way up the rings pass any natural motion of the station that goes round at that rate. On the working design there are two. Under 0.1 rpm the hub rocks against the rings on the bearings' tilt stiffness. Near 0.68 rpm the hub bends between the rings.

A resonance needs time to build, about as long as its motion takes to die out. The first is narrow and a thirty-day spin-up is through it in minutes, so it never reaches its height; a dwell on it would. The second is broad, and is met in full at any pace thrusters can give.

Two panels, main bearing and hub neck, each showing load as a share of its placeholder limit against spin rate from 0 to 1.5 rpm. With the pumps held the bearing reaches 90 percent and the neck 99 percent of their limits at 0.69 rpm. With the pumps working neither passes 6 percent.
Three rings from rest to 1.50 rpm with 300, 150 and 80 t left off-centre by the fill. With the trim pumps held, the hub's bending crossing takes the neck to 99 % of its placeholder limit. With the balance working on the way up, that crossing passes unnoticed. These two runs are at a three-day pace, a tenth of the real time.
The spin-up with the pumps held, recorded from the simulator: three days in two minutes, motion drawn ten times life size. The bending crossing comes a little under halfway through.
The same spin-up with the pumps working once the first crossing is behind, and a dwell at 0.5 rpm. Motion drawn a hundred times life size, and there is still little to see.

At the real thirty-day pace, with the balance on throughout, the largest bearing load of the whole month is 7.6 % of the limit, at 0.056 rpm on the second day. That is the first crossing itself, and it comes before the readings can tell anything. The 300 t is down to 65 t by day three and under a tonne by day ten. The bending crossing passes at 0.13 % of the neck's limit.

Hold the pumps through the first crossing. Just past it the readings begin to tell something, but what they tell there is wrong, and acting on it made that crossing worse: 7.2 % of the bearing limit against 5.6 % with the pumps held until 0.10 rpm.

6. Normal operation

All three rings at 1.50 rpm, and people living in them. The balance is kept by pumped water, the axes are held by the pods, and the station's ordinary traffic goes on.

Balance by pumped water

A lived-in ring is never quite even. A load off-centre moves the ring's mass centre off the bearing axis, and because the hub is the light body, the hub is what gets carried round, once a turn. The shield is water in 40 segments, so the correction is to pump a little of it from one side to the other.

The water is not teleported. Pumps have a rate, segments have a range, and water moving round a turning ring pushes on it while it moves, because it is turning faster or slower than the ring it is in. A correction made evenly over a time T adds 2 / (spin rate × T) of the load it is removing:

Correction made overExtra load from the water in motion
13 secondsas much again
2 minutesa tenth
20 minutesone part in a hundred

So the pumps are not the limit. At 100 kg/s each they could cancel a 45 t load in 25 seconds, and doing so would load the hub half as much again as the load itself. Going slowly is the choice. The imbalance is estimated from the motion (accelerometers on the hub at the three ring stations, load cells at the three bearings, each reading turned back by the ring's angle and averaged) and the trim is moved against the estimate over about an hour. At full rate the readings tell about 0.1 t at the floor.

Three lines over two hours. With the balance held the ring carries 45 tonnes of imbalance throughout. Balanced from the motion it falls to about 2 tonnes after an hour and a quarter of a tonne after two. With the manifest knowing the load the imbalance never appears.
A 45 t load brought down a spoke to the floor of one ring. Balanced from the motion, 34 t of water is moved and no segment uses more than half a percent of its trim range. If the manifest knows the load (what, where, when) the trim follows it down and the motion is left only what the manifest has wrong.

Holding the axis

A ring's axis is held by pods at its rim firing along the axis. The pods are fixed to the ring and are either on or off, so a pair can only push the way that is wanted as it passes that way, every five seconds for one pair or another. Timing matters more than thrust:

How a pair is firedPropellant, against a thruster that could push any way at any moment
In a pulse centred on the moment it passes the wanted direction1 % more
From the moment it enters a 60° window26 % more
Whenever it can help at all46 % more

The law has two terms: one that points the axis, pushing at right angles to the error as a gyroscope requires, and one that opposes the tilt rate. Without the second the first feeds the ring's own 20-second wobble. And the second is where the cost is, because it needs to know the tilt rate.

Three bars. With the tilt rate taken from a noisy tilt reading the pods burn 24 tonnes a day. A rate sensor brings that to 9. With the pods left off below three thousandths of a degree it is 0.
Normal operation with a 45 t load off-centre on one ring. Nothing needs holding, so anything burned is the reading's doing. With the tilt rate taken from a tilt reading that has a thousandth of a degree of noise, the pods burn 24 t a day answering noise. A rate sensor good to 0.00003°/s brings that to 9. With the floor under which the pods stay off set three times clear of the noise, they do not fire at all. This run is on the model's first, stiffer bearing and has yet to be repeated on the working design.

One more finding. A reading that arrives four to six seconds late is a quarter-turn late for the 20-second wobble and feeds it; bearing actuators or a rate sensor remove that band.

A normal day

Six hours of ordinary occurrences on the simulator: a shuttle docks, two water cartridges cross to a ring and are emptied, a shift change gathers three hundred people on one side of a ring and disperses them, a transit car makes three and a half circuits, cargo comes down a spoke, a tanker docks, stores are stowed to one side, the shuttle leaves.

A normal day, six hours in two minutes, motion drawn a hundred times life size. The trim pumps work and hold. No pod fires all day. The largest load on a bearing is 0.28 % of its limit, with the crowd on one ring and the transit car on another.

With a ring trimmed to what the readings can tell, the hub moves 0.14 mm once a turn, 0.3 micro-g sideways, which is what a laboratory fixed to the hub would feel.

Faults in normal operation

A turning ring is hard to move, and the faults that lean a ring at rest do much less to it.

  • A pod pair stuck on for an hour. The ring carries the pair round, so its push averages to nothing in space and the lean stays under a thousandth of a degree. It reads to the balance as the ring being heavier on one side, and the pumps pass 80 t of water fore and aft against it without being told.
  • A bearing actuator stuck at its full moment for an hour. Its ring leans 0.27° against the hub, 10 % of the crossing gap.
  • A day's top-off landing in one segment, never trimmed. 8 % of the crossing gap and 17 % of the neck's limit.
  • All control lost for a day. Nothing grows. A wobble left alone dies out by itself, over years.

7. What changed as the model grew

A few early figures changed as the model was extended. They are listed because anyone checking this work would want to know.

WhatWasIsWhy
Propellant to turn or hold a ring's axis21 t to bring a ring in from 0.1°43 tA moment across the rim takes a pod on each side. Only one of the two had been counted, so every such figure doubled. Spin-up propellant was unaffected.
Resonances crossed in a spin-upOneTwoThe first sweep stepped over two narrow peaks. They are now found by search, and each is cut to what the spin-up has time to build, checked against runs in time.
Bearing actuator gain1012 N m s/rad2 × 1010 on a soft bearingThe first gain was chosen beside a stiffer bearing. On a soft one it made the bearing act stiff once a turn. A recording from the simulator showed the actuator carrying fifty times the bearing's own moment.
When the balance actsWhenever it had an estimateOnly when the estimate is worth havingAt low spin rates the readings cannot tell an imbalance the trim could cancel, and just past the first resonance the estimate is wrong. Acting on either made things worse.

8. What is open

  • The bearing. Something soft in tilt that still carries a 2.2 Mt ring sideways, with its travel and its stops. The window above is a requirement on it; nothing is designed.
  • What reads tilt and tilt rate on a turning ring. Whether the pods burn anything in normal operation depends on it.
  • Slosh. The share of the shield's water that does not follow its ring is carried as an unknown and swept. It waits on the shield's internal layout.
  • The limits. Every load here is a share of a placeholder. A bearing and a neck with designs behind them would replace them.
  • The fill. How the fill is metered evenly enough for the first crossing.
  • Emergencies. All three rings brought to rest in a hurry. Not started.
  • Not in the model yet. Orbit keeping, the Moon's gravity gradient on the spin axis, a ring's own flexing, thermal bending of the hub, and the ring's rate changing as mass moves in or out along a spoke.

9. Status

What exists. A dynamics model in plain code with 125 checks against results known without it; a simulator that steps the model live and takes commands; an operator console that watches and steers the simulator; sixteen recorded runs, among them a normal day, the fill's traffic, a fault during the fill, and spin-ups at a three-day pace and at the real thirty-day pace.

What is a model. Everything. No requirements review and no flight software exist for this domain yet; the console steers the simulator directly. The stiffnesses, dampings, limits, noise levels and pump sizes are placeholders chosen to be plausible, and the results are conditions (if the bearing is this stiff, then this), not verdicts.

If something here is wrong. The model, the simulator and the recordings are proprietary to Aegis Station and are not slated for public release; they are shared for evaluation with qualified organizations under agreement. A correction is welcome from anyone: contact@aegisstation.com.


← Aegis Station